Crisis-response training such as lockdown and Run-Hide-Fight can save lives but does not prevent school shootings¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Emergency response protocols are reactive measures activated after a gunman is present and do not prevent attacks; proactive threat assessment addresses prevention. → Langman 2018
Evidence¶
Langman 2018¶
Langman, P., Petrosino, A., & Persson, H. (2018). Five misconceptions about school shootings. San Francisco, CA: WestEd. https://www.wested.org/resources/five-misconceptions-about-school-shootings/
q2 · i? · review · r1
The brief argues that lockdown procedures and survival trainings such as "Run, Hide, Fight" are emergency responses activated after a gunman is already in the building, and therefore do not prevent attacks. It positions threat assessment as the proactive complement to reactive crisis response.
"These trainings and procedures are important and can save lives, but they are not the only thing that schools can do, and crisis response procedures do not prevent school shootings"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- 95 percent of U.S. schools conduct lockdown drills annually as part of emergency response plans — related
- Behavioral skills training produced near-complete skill mastery of lockdown steps among young students, per studies the brief summarizes — related
- Lockdown training and drill participation improved students' knowledge and perceptions of preparedness without increasing anxiety, per the studies the brief reviews — related
- Research on SRO effectiveness does not address whether their presence deters mass shootings, though schools with police are more likely to have emergency plans and regular safety checks — related
- Two mass shootings exemplify how metal detectors can be insufficient at stopping such attacks — related
- School shooters are rarely the bullied loners of popular stereotype, and bullying prevention alone will not eliminate shootings — related
- State school safety legislation most commonly addresses emergency management, followed by the existence and structure of SSSCs and threat assessment — related
- Hardening strategies such as police in schools and metal detectors intervene too late in the pathway to violence to prevent attacks — related
- Metal detector effectiveness depends heavily on the human element: training, correct operation and functioning equipment — related
- School shooters do not fit a single consistent profile; perpetrators, motivations, and attacks vary widely — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
crisis-response-does-not-prevent-shootings |
title |
Crisis-response training such as lockdown and Run-Hide-Fight can save lives but does not prevent school shootings |
description |
Crisis-response training such as lockdown and Run-Hide-Fight can save lives but does not prevent school shootings |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2018 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — langman-2018 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.