Claims

Two mass shootings exemplify how metal detectors can be insufficient at stopping such attacks

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q1
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? At Red Lake High School in 2005, a student shot the guard operating the metal detector and brought three weapons through the device. → Schildkraut 2019

Evidence

Schildkraut 2019

Schildkraut, J., & Grogan, K. (2019). Are metal detectors effective at making schools safer? San Francisco, CA: WestEd. https://www.wested.org/resources/are-metal-detectors-effective-at-making-schools-safer

q1 · i? · review · r2

Case evidence cited in the brief: despite a standing metal detector at Red Lake High School, the perpetrator killed the guard operating it and brought three weapons into the school. Seven people were killed and five injured.

"the school had a standing metal detector present on March 21, 2005, but a student arrived at the school and shot and killed the unarmed security guard who was operating the metal detector"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id metal-detectors-insufficient-mass-shooting-cases
title Two mass shootings exemplify how metal detectors can be insufficient at stopping such attacks
description Two mass shootings exemplify how metal detectors can be insufficient at stopping such attacks
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2019
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — schildkraut-2019

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.