Critical disposition is least spontaneous when confronting one's most basic prejudices or deeply held convictions¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoreticalr2·q1
Currency · newest study 1995 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2000: baselines and conditions change
Evidence quality · No study behind this claim is a peer-reviewed article with a DOI: it rests on an ERIC document (a report, conference paper or thesis). It is kept because 2 design pages cite it; treat it as a lead to check, not an established finding.
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? Students may possess the ability but not the disposition to critically assess their own most basic beliefs and convictions. → Johnson 1995
Evidence¶
Johnson 1995¶
Johnson, David Kenneth. (1995). CRITO: Informal Logic, Critical Thinking, and the Argumentative Essay. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED384062
q1 · i? · theoretical · r2
Theoretical argument in the paper's introduction, paraphrasing Siegel: the disposition to apply reason assessment fails precisely when one's own deepest convictions are at stake, even when the ability is present. No empirical data are offered.
"the critical temper is least spontaneous as we confront our most basic prejudices or deeply held convictions. In these situations, to paraphrase Siegel, we may possess the ability, but not the disposition, to assess critically certain of our beliefs or claims."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Prospective teachers' critical thinking dispositions are positively and moderately correlated with their preference for contemporary educational philosophy — related
- Prospective teachers' critical thinking dispositions show no significant relationship with traditional educational philosophy preference — related
- Critical thinking disposition subscales jointly explain about 14% of contemporary educational philosophy preference, with innovation the only significant predictor — related
- A systematic review of bias-mitigation training names considering the opposite as a previously validated way to reduce judgment biases, without testing it itself — related
- Critical science education requires explicit attention to philosophy of science and rival theories — related
- Over-reliance on GAI risks weakening teaching and social presence and depriving students of foundational skill development — related
- Teachers' spontaneous in-the-moment reactions draw on internalised earlier values rather than the curriculum's constitutive values — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
critical-temper-weakest-on-basic-prejudices |
title |
Critical disposition is least spontaneous when confronting one's most basic prejudices or deeply held convictions |
description |
Critical disposition is least spontaneous when confronting one's most basic prejudices or deeply held convictions |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
1995 |
recheck_by |
2000 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-27 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — johnson-1995 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.