The coordinated school health approach saw scattered US adoption, hindered by pressures on administrators and lack of integration into School Improvement Plans¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoreticalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? CSH adoption across the United States was scattered, with school health coordinating councils' work often not included in School Improvement Plans and budget declines and punitive accountability measures negatively affecting administrator adoption. → Lewallen TC 2015
Evidence¶
Lewallen TC 2015¶
Lewallen TC, Hunt H, Potts-Datema W, Zaza S, Giles W. (2015). The Whole School, Whole Community, Whole Child Model: A New Approach for Improving Educational Attainment and Healthy Development for Students. Journal of School Health. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12310
q2 · i? · theoretical · r2
The article's narrative assessment of CSH implementation, attributed to years of observing the approach in schools and districts. It states that "declines in school budgets and punitive measures taken against schools that do not meet standards have also had a negative impact on administrators' adoption of CSH." No systematic data are reported.
"However, CSH has had scattered adoption across the United States. School health coordinating councils often have not had their work included into School Improvement Plans, a key requirement for successful integration and sustainability"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The WSCC model was developed in 2013 by ASCD and CDC expert panels to unify the Whole Child and coordinated school health approaches — related
- Cross-sector leadership programs were widely viewed as the most successful collaboration grant activities, while limited grant time period and scope and lack of goal clarity hindered implementation — related
- Colorado uses a local-first, state-supported model in which districts and local providers initiate cross-sector work and state policy scales successful innovations — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
csh-scattered-adoption-barriers |
title |
The coordinated school health approach saw scattered US adoption, hindered by pressures on administrators and lack of integration into School Improvement Plans |
description |
The coordinated school health approach saw scattered US adoption, hindered by pressures on administrators and lack of integration into School Improvement Plans |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2015 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — lewallen-tc-2015 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.