Both CSTPP groups rated the system highly, with the home-based parental-participation group averaging slightly higher satisfaction¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? On a 10-item 4-point satisfaction survey, Group A averaged 3.58 and Group B 3.29, with different items favouring each group. → Chiu 2014

Evidence¶

Chiu 2014¶

Fu-Yuan Chiu. (2014). The Application of a Cloud-Based Student, Teacher, and Parent Platform in English as a Foreign Language Education. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(3), 178-187. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1034232

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Post-experiment satisfaction survey administered to Groups A and B, 10 items on a 4-point Likert scale. Table 5 reports average scores of 3.58 for Group A and 3.29 for Group B; items on efficiency and feeling superior favoured Group B, visual design and interest favoured Group A.

"Data in Table 5 show that both groups had high evaluations of the system. However, the scores of Group A were slightly higher than those of Group B."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The article concludes the CSTPP is better suited to home-based self-study with close teacher-parent interaction — related
• Students using the CSTPP in class without parental participation showed no significant pre-post change in overall attitudes to learning English — related
• Junior high school students using the CSTPP at home with parental participation showed a significant pre-post increase in attitudes toward instruction — related