Domain-specific CT performance (CTEM) significantly predicted domain-general CT performance (posttest HCTA)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr1–r2·q3·i3large
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i3 CTEM scores significantly correlated with posttest HCTA scores (r = .38). → Tiruneh 2016
q3 i? In linear regression, CTEM performance significantly predicted posttest HCTA scores, with the article reporting R² = .145 (14.5% of variance explained). → Tiruneh 2016 (2)
Evidence¶
Tiruneh 2016¶
Tiruneh, D. T., Weldeslassie, A. G., Kassa, A., Tefera, Z., De Cock, M., & Elen, J. (2016). Systematic design of a learning environment for domain-specific and domain-general critical thinking skills. Education Tech Research Dev, 64, 481–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9417-2
q3 · i3 · causal · r1
Pearson correlation across both groups pooled showed "the CTEM scores significantly correlated with the posttest HCTA scores", r = .38. This is a correlational finding, not causal.
"Moreover, the CTEM scores significantly correlated with the posttest HCTA scores ( r = .38, p = .01)."
Tiruneh 2016 (2)¶
Tiruneh, D. T., Weldeslassie, A. G., Kassa, A., Tefera, Z., De Cock, M., & Elen, J. (2016). Systematic design of a learning environment for domain-specific and domain-general critical thinking skills. Education Tech Research Dev, 64, 481–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9417-2
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Linear regression showed "CTEM performance was a significant predictor, accounting for 14.5% of the variance in posttest HCTA scores"; the article prints R² = .145 but no standardized effect size for this finding.
"A linear regression analysis also revealed that the CTEM test explained a significant proportion of the variance on posttest HCTA performance, F(1, 87) = 14.7, p = .05, R2 = .145."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The systematically designed learning environment did not produce a significantly greater pretest–posttest improvement in domain-general CT than regular instruction — related
- Systematically designed E&M instruction based on the First Principles of Instruction model produced significantly higher domain-specific CT scores than regular instruction — related
- The type of CT measure employed (standardized vs. non-standardized; item format) influences evaluation of intervention effectiveness — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
ctem-predicts-posttest-hcta |
title |
Domain-specific CT performance (CTEM) significantly predicted domain-general CT performance (posttest HCTA) |
description |
Domain-specific CT performance (CTEM) significantly predicted domain-general CT performance (posttest HCTA) |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2016 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — tiruneh-2016, tiruneh-2016-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.