Claims

Systematically designed E&M instruction based on the First Principles of Instruction model produced significantly higher domain-specific CT scores than regular instruction

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 The experimental condition scored significantly higher than the control condition on the CTEM domain-specific CT test (d = 1.55). → Tiruneh 2016

Evidence

Tiruneh 2016

Tiruneh, D. T., Weldeslassie, A. G., Kassa, A., Tefera, Z., De Cock, M., & Elen, J. (2016). Systematic design of a learning environment for domain-specific and domain-general critical thinking skills. Education Tech Research Dev, 64, 481–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9417-2

q3 · i3 · causal · r1

A pretest–posttest quasi-experiment with 45 experimental and 44 control first-year physics students. An independent samples t test showed the "CTEM mean score for the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group", d = 1.55, exceeding Cohen's convention for a large effect.

"The results indicated that the CTEM mean score for the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group, t(87) = 7.15, p < .001, d = 1.55."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id systematic-design-first-principles-higher-domain-specific-ct
title Systematically designed E&M instruction based on the First Principles of Instruction model produced significantly higher domain-specific CT scores than regular instruction
description Systematically designed E&M instruction based on the First Principles of Instruction model produced significantly higher domain-specific CT scores than regular instruction
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2016
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — tiruneh-2016

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.