Claims

Iterative curiosity–resolution cycles can build knowledge networks and a foundation for individual interest

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The review argues that repeated cycles of curiosity resolution construct elaborative knowledge and value, potentially developing into individual interest. → Shin 2019

Evidence

Shin 2019

Shin, D. D., & Kim, S. (2019). Homo Curious: Curious or Interested? Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09497-x

q2 · i? · review · r2

Narrative review argument: successful resolution enhances satisfaction and expected future satisfaction, encouraging further curiosity and deeper information seeking. The review contrasts this with the externally supported four-phase path from situational to individual interest.

"Through this iterative curiosity –resolution cycle, individuals may construct a more elaborative knowledge network and build a foundation for individual interest"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id curiosity-resolution-cycle-individual-interest
title Iterative curiosity–resolution cycles can build knowledge networks and a foundation for individual interest
description Iterative curiosity–resolution cycles can build knowledge networks and a foundation for individual interest
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2019
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — shin-2019

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.