Claims

Learner DASH-SV ratings of instructor debriefing were high, with mean scores above 5.8/7 across all six elements and element three lowest

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Across 21 quarterly learner DASH-SV evaluations, mean scores for all six elements were above 5.8 (maximum of seven); element three (structured the debriefing in an organized way) scored lowest at 5.8 (SD = 0.89), and elements two and six scored the maximum of seven. → Jeffers 2019

Evidence

Jeffers 2019

Jeffers, J. M., & Poling, S. (2019). The development and implementation of a 12-month simulation-based learning curriculum for pediatric emergency medicine fellows utilizing debriefing with good judgment and rapid cycle deliberate practice. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1417-6

q2 · i? · design · r2

Instructor performance was evaluated via learner-completed DASH-SV forms collected quarterly for a total of 21 evaluations, consistent with attendance rates. The article reports "Mean scores for all six elements were above 5.8 (maximum of seven)"; these are descriptive means with no inferential test.

"Mean scores for all six elements were above 5.8 (maximum of seven). The lowest scoring element was element three (The instructor structured the debriefing in an organized way) with a mean score of 5.8 (SD = 0.89)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.