Claims

Participants perceive manikin death as reflecting inadequate resuscitation, but facilitator reassurance and debriefing resolve this

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Death of the manikin was commonly perceived as reflecting inadequate management, attributed to unfamiliarity with death as a scenario outcome; reassurance and debrief allowed participants to work through discomfort. → Apara Teleireoluwa 2024

Evidence

Apara Teleireoluwa 2024

Apara Teleireoluwa, Hogan Tom, Peterson Jennifer L H. (2024). Death of the paediatric manikin: a scoping review. BMJ Paediatrics Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002941

q2 · i? · review · r3

Qualitative theme from the included studies, particularly Lizotte 2015, where professionals found a non-responding manikin felt 'unusual'. All participants agreed experiencing manikin death scenarios was beneficial for their training.

"Reassurance from the facilitator that death of the manikin was a learning objective for the scenario and the opportunity to participate in a facilitated debrief allowed participants to work through their discomfort."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.