Paediatric manikin death does not impair resuscitation performance measured against the NRP algorithm¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Objective NRP algorithm performance scores showed no difference between death and survival scenarios (median 82% vs 80%, p=0.99). → Apara Teleireoluwa 2024

Evidence¶

Apara Teleireoluwa 2024¶

Apara Teleireoluwa, Hogan Tom, Peterson Jennifer L H. (2024). Death of the paediatric manikin: a scoping review. BMJ Paediatrics Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002941

q2 · i? · review · r3

Secondary outcome of the Lizotte 2017 randomised trial reported in the review: participants randomised to scenario order, performance scored against the NRP algorithm. The review reports "no difference between the groups" with the printed medians and p-value.

"Additionally, objective measures of performance using the NRP algorithm showed no difference between the groups (median performance score 80% for survival scenario and 82% for death scenario regardless of the scenario order (p=0.99))."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Healthcare professionals report that paediatric manikin death increases the realism of simulation scenarios — related
• Participants perceive manikin death as reflecting inadequate resuscitation, but facilitator reassurance and debriefing resolve this — related
• Participation in neonatal simulation raises salivary cortisol, but the rise is not dependent on whether the manikin dies — related
• Prebrief disclosure that the manikin may die was not reported by participants as essential for psychological safety — related