Prebrief disclosure that the manikin may die was not reported by participants as essential for psychological safety¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Participants agreed that disclosure that the manikin would or may die was not required in the prebrief or predefined learning objectives. → Apara Teleireoluwa 2024

Evidence¶

Apara Teleireoluwa 2024¶

Apara Teleireoluwa, Hogan Tom, Peterson Jennifer L H. (2024). Death of the paediatric manikin: a scoping review. BMJ Paediatrics Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002941

q2 · i? · review · r3

Qualitative participant data from the included studies. The review contrasts this with Truog and Meyer's adult-simulation proposal of extensive prebriefing discussion of possible death, noting realism concerns.

"Conversely, participants agreed that a disclosure that the manikin would, or may, die in the scenario was not required in the prebrief or in the predefined learning objectives."

Discussion¶

Learner Variables¶

• Safety — outcome: instruction changes it

Related Claims¶

• Participants perceive manikin death as reflecting inadequate resuscitation, but facilitator reassurance and debriefing resolve this — related
• Healthcare professionals report that paediatric manikin death increases the realism of simulation scenarios — related
• Paediatric manikin death does not impair resuscitation performance measured against the NRP algorithm — related
• Participation in neonatal simulation raises salivary cortisol, but the rise is not dependent on whether the manikin dies — related
• High-tech VAD equipment made some participants feel under observation and stressed, and viewing recorded mistakes before teammates was seen as critical in both VAD forms, a potential threat to psychological safety — related