Claims

An EBP curriculum culture intervention at a dental college increased students' journal reading, research-report evaluation confidence, and evidence-use experience

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? First-year dental students showed pre-post increases in being more likely to read dental and medical journals (53/104 vs. 19/90, P<0.001), more confident in evaluating research reports (95% vs. 71%, P<0.001), and more experienced using evidence (84% vs. 67%, P<0.05). → Kyriakoulis Konstantinos 2016

Evidence

Kyriakoulis Konstantinos 2016

Kyriakoulis Konstantinos, Patelarou Athina, Laliotis Aggelos, Wan Andrew C, Matalliotakis Michail, Tsiou Chrysoula, Patelarou Evridiki. (2016). Educational strategies for teaching evidence-based practice to undergraduate health students: systematic review. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5066070/

q3 · i? · review · r2

Pre-post evaluation of a multifaceted intervention (lectures, interactive sessions, small group discussions, seminars) for 1st-year dental students in the US. Table 3 reports "More likely to read dental and medical journals: 53/104 vs. 19/90, P<0.001", plus confidence (95% vs. 71%, P<0.001) and experience (84% vs. 67%, P<0.05) gains.

"More likely to read dental and medical journals: 53/104 vs. 19/90, P<0.001"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.