Claims

Implementation challenges of adaptive learning classify into facilitators, barriers, and neutral challenges, and a single determinant can act as prerequisite, moderator, strategy, or outcome

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? All challenges were classified by valence into facilitators (+), barriers (−), and neutral challenges (0), and the same determinant could play different roles in different empirical connections. → Mirata 2023

Evidence

Mirata 2023

Mirata, V., & Bergamin, P. (2023). Role of organisational readiness and stakeholder acceptance: an implementation framework of adaptive learning for higher education. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10248-7

q2 · i? · qualitative · r3

Secondary analysis of qualitative Delphi data from 51 experts at two universities, coded inductively with axial coding in NVivo 12 Pro. The article reports the valence classification and that "a specific determinant could act as a prerequisite, moderator, and strategy or an outcome according to its empirical connection with other elements".

"The first finding of the study was that all challenges associated with effective implementation were classified into three determinant groups according to their valence, namely, facilitators with a positive impact (+); barriers with a negative impact (−) and challenges with a neutral impact (0)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.