Interest is substantially more stable over time than boredom, whose autoregressive paths are low and decline¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Latent stability coefficients were high for interest (β up to 0.88) and low for boredom (β 0.17–0.53), with boredom stabilities declining over waves. → Katharina Luisa Boehme 2025
Evidence¶
Katharina Luisa Boehme 2025¶
Katharina Luisa Boehme, Thomas Goetz, Markus Feuchter, Franzis Preckel. (2025). Is Boredom the Opposite of Interest? A Longitudinal Reciprocal Effect Study. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-09991-5
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Stability paths from the 2-variable latent cross-lagged models. In the combined 4-variable model, interest stabilities were 0.71–0.88, while boredom showed significant stability only from T1 to T2 (β = 0.29 and 0.34); later German boredom paths (β = 0.18, 0.17) did not reach significance. These are stability path coefficients, not effect sizes, so no magnitude code is assigned.
"In the mathematics model, interest displayed a generally much higher level of stability than boredom (boredom: βBO-M[T1] →BO-M[T2] = 0.53, βBO-M[T2] →BO-M[T3] = 0.32, βBO-M[T3] →BO-M[T4] = 0.26; interest: βINT-M[T1] →INT-M[T2] = 0.80, βINT-M[T2] →INT-M[T3] = 0.76, βINT-M[T3] →INT-M[T4] = 0.71)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Latent boredom means increased and latent interest means declined from grade 5 to grade 8 in both domains — related
- Epistemic emotions showed no significant carry-over (autoregressive) stability from one course session to the next, except boredom after session type was included. — reports the opposite
- Higher earlier interest is associated with later decreases in boredom across grades 5–8, at every wave in mathematics and all but the last in German — related
- Achievement rank-order stability is high across primary school, with written-language stability (β = 0.62–0.75) exceeding mathematics stability (β = 0.38–0.45) — related
- Mathematics enjoyment decreases and boredom increases from first to third grade, while mean enjoyment stays fairly high and boredom low — related
- TSE and burnout levels are autoregressively stable: current levels predict future levels of the same construct — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
differential-stability-interest-boredom |
title |
Interest is substantially more stable over time than boredom, whose autoregressive paths are low and decline |
description |
Interest is substantially more stable over time than boredom, whose autoregressive paths are low and decline |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — katharina-luisa-boehme-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.