Claims

TSE and burnout levels are autoregressively stable: current levels predict future levels of the same construct

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Current TSE predicts future TSE and current burnout predicts future burnout across the three waves. → Kim 2020

Evidence

Kim 2020

Kim, Lisa E. and Burić, Irena. (2020). Teacher self-efficacy and burnout: Determining the directions of prediction through an autoregressive cross-lagged panel model. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000424

q3 · i? · associational · r3

Autoregressive paths from the final cross-lagged path models with covariates. The article reports "current TSE levels predicted future TSE levels" (β = .299 to .626) and stability paths for exhaustion and disengagement, supporting H9 and H10.

"current TSE levels predicted future TSE levels (β = .299 to .626) and current burnout levels predicted future burnout levels (β = .205 to .745 for exhaustion; β = .233 to .738 for disengagement), in support for H9 and H10, respectively"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id tse-burnout-autoregressive-stability
title TSE and burnout levels are autoregressively stable: current levels predict future levels of the same construct
description TSE and burnout levels are autoregressively stable: current levels predict future levels of the same construct
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2020
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-23
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — kim-2020

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.