Publication type and study origin do not significantly moderate the digital story effect on academic achievement¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · quant-synthesisr2–r3·q3
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? The type of publication moderator (articles vs dissertations) does not cause a significant difference on effect sizes (p > .05). → Nurullah Sahin and İsmail Coban 2020
q3 i? The study origin moderator (Turkey vs Foreign) does not cause a significant difference on effect sizes (p > .05). → Nurullah Sahin and İsmail Coban 2020 (2)
Evidence¶
Nurullah Sahin and İsmail Coban 2020¶
Nurullah Sahin and İsmail Coban. (2020). The effect of digital story applications on students' academic achievement: A meta-analysis study. African Educational Research Journal, Special Issue 8(3), S62-S75. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1274516
q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2
Moderator analysis reported in the Findings section (Table 6): 36 articles (ES = 0.733) versus 58 dissertations (ES = 0.760), Q = 0.062, df = 1, p = 0.803. Joint effect sizes in both publication types were significant and favored the experimental group.
"it is determined that the type of publication moderator variable does not cause a significant difference on the effect size value (p > .05)."
Nurullah Sahin and İsmail Coban 2020 (2)¶
Nurullah Sahin and İsmail Coban. (2020). The effect of digital story applications on students' academic achievement: A meta-analysis study. African Educational Research Journal, Special Issue 8(3), S62-S75. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1274516
q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3
Moderator analysis reported in the Findings section (Table 9): 74 Turkey studies (ES = 0.749) versus 20 Foreign studies (ES = 0.746), Q = 0.001, df = 1, p = 0.977. Both categories' joint effect sizes were significant and favored the experimental group.
"it was determined that the moderator variable study of origin does not cause a significant difference on the effect size value (p>.05)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Teaching level significantly moderates the digital story effect, with kindergarten showing the highest joint effect size — related
- Effect sizes of PBL on science achievement differ significantly by publication type, with conference proceedings showing a negative effect — related
- Effect sizes are larger for peer-reviewed published articles than dissertations and for quasiexperimental pre-post designs than comparative post-only designs — related
- Application period, publication type, database, grade level, scale used, school starting age, country and sample size do not significantly moderate the effect of student-centred methods on mathematics achievement — related
- Academic achievement effects of STEM practices differ significantly by publication type and education level but not by lesson type — related
- Digital story applications have a high positive average effect on students' academic achievement compared to other teaching methods (ES = 0.750) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.