Claims

Publication type and study origin do not significantly moderate the digital story effect on academic achievement

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · quant-synthesis r2–r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The type of publication moderator (articles vs dissertations) does not cause a significant difference on effect sizes (p > .05). → Nurullah Sahin and İsmail Coban 2020 q3 i? The study origin moderator (Turkey vs Foreign) does not cause a significant difference on effect sizes (p > .05). → Nurullah Sahin and İsmail Coban 2020 (2)

Evidence

Nurullah Sahin and İsmail Coban 2020

Nurullah Sahin and İsmail Coban. (2020). The effect of digital story applications on students' academic achievement: A meta-analysis study. African Educational Research Journal, Special Issue 8(3), S62-S75. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1274516

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Moderator analysis reported in the Findings section (Table 6): 36 articles (ES = 0.733) versus 58 dissertations (ES = 0.760), Q = 0.062, df = 1, p = 0.803. Joint effect sizes in both publication types were significant and favored the experimental group.

"it is determined that the type of publication moderator variable does not cause a significant difference on the effect size value (p > .05)."

Nurullah Sahin and İsmail Coban 2020 (2)

Nurullah Sahin and İsmail Coban. (2020). The effect of digital story applications on students' academic achievement: A meta-analysis study. African Educational Research Journal, Special Issue 8(3), S62-S75. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1274516

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Moderator analysis reported in the Findings section (Table 9): 74 Turkey studies (ES = 0.749) versus 20 Foreign studies (ES = 0.746), Q = 0.001, df = 1, p = 0.977. Both categories' joint effect sizes were significant and favored the experimental group.

"it was determined that the moderator variable study of origin does not cause a significant difference on the effect size value (p>.05)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.