Disabled readers produce more current nonfinal and extraneous intrusions, implicating access and restraint failures¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2000 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Disabled readers produced more current nonfinal (CNF) intrusions than skilled readers in Experiment 1. → Chiappe 2000
q3 i? Disabled readers produced more extraneous (E) intrusions than skilled readers in Experiment 1. → Chiappe 2000 (2)
Evidence¶
Chiappe 2000¶
Chiappe, P., Hasher, L., & Siegel, L. S. (2000). Working memory, inhibitory control, and reading disability. Memory & Cognition, 28(1), 8-17. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03211570
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Error analysis of the blocked listening span task in Experiment 1 (N = 665). CNF intrusions are words from the current trial that are not targets, interpreted as failures of the access function of inhibition. The age x reading group interaction was also significant.
"Skilled readers produced fewer CNF intrusions than disabled readers [F(l,655) = 15.82,p < .001]."
Chiappe 2000 (2)¶
Chiappe, P., Hasher, L., & Siegel, L. S. (2000). Working memory, inhibitory control, and reading disability. Memory & Cognition, 28(1), 8-17. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03211570
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Error analysis of the blocked listening span task in Experiment 1. Extraneous intrusions are words not presented in current or previous trials, interpreted as reflecting deficiencies in the restraining function of inhibition. The age x reading group interaction was not significant.
"Skilled readers produced fewer E intrusions than did disabled readers [F(l ,655) = 5.08, p < .01]."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Access — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
- Executive Function — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- Age-related decline in span is associated only with the access function of inhibition, and only among skilled readers — related
- Disabled readers show working memory deficits at every age on the blocked listening span task — related
- Omission (no response) errors vary with age but not with reading skill — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
disabled-readers-more-cnf-and-extraneous-intrusions |
title |
Disabled readers produce more current nonfinal and extraneous intrusions, implicating access and restraint failures |
description |
Disabled readers produce more current nonfinal and extraneous intrusions, implicating access and restraint failures |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2000 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — chiappe-2000, chiappe-2000-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.