Omission (no response) errors vary with age but not with reading skill¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2000 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? In Experiment 1, no-response rates differed among age groups but showed no difference as a function of reading skill. → Chiappe 2000
Evidence¶
Chiappe 2000¶
Chiappe, P., Hasher, L., & Siegel, L. S. (2000). Working memory, inhibitory control, and reading disability. Memory & Cognition, 28(1), 8-17. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03211570
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Error analysis of omissions in Experiment 1's blocked listening span task. Post hoc comparisons indicated children under 10 committed more no-response errors than all older groups; there were no differences in omission rates by reading skill.
"The rate of no responses differed significantly among the five age groups [F(4,624) = 8.59, p < .001). However, neither the main effectof reading group [F(l ,624) < 1, n.s.] nor the age X reading group interaction was sig- nificant [F(4,419) < 1, n.s.]."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Age and Developmental Stage — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- Disabled readers show working memory deficits at every age on the blocked listening span task — related
- Omission and commission errors in n-back tasks have different correlates and may represent different processes — related
- Age-related decline in span is associated only with the access function of inhibition, and only among skilled readers — related
- Increased motivation eliminated ADHD–TD differences on most attention measures but differences persisted in complex multitasking and commission errors — related
- Children's text comprehension test performance improved from T1 to T2, driven mainly by second graders, with fewer omission errors over time — related
- Blocked-format span declines after age 20 but mixed-format span does not, implicating proactive interference in aging declines — related
- Disabled readers produce more current nonfinal and extraneous intrusions, implicating access and restraint failures — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
no-response-errors-age-not-reading-skill |
title |
Omission (no response) errors vary with age but not with reading skill |
description |
Omission (no response) errors vary with age but not with reading skill |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2000 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — chiappe-2000 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.