Claims

Undergraduate researchers' disciplinary identity differs by demographic characteristics

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Disciplinary identity among undergraduate researchers differs by demographic characteristics. → Shannon N. Davis 2019

Evidence

Shannon N. Davis 2019

Shannon N. Davis, Sarah E. Wagner. (2019). Research Motivations and Undergraduate Researchers' Disciplinary Identity. Sage Open, vol. 9, issue 3. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/research-motivations-and-undergraduate-researchers-disciplinary-identity

q2 · i? · associational · r?

The same four-institution survey documented "key differences in disciplinary identity" associated with demographic characteristics alongside the motivational correlates. No specific demographics or effect sizes are printed in the available text.

"We document key differences in disciplinary identity based upon two internal motivators, intellectual interest and grit, as well as demographic characteristics."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id disciplinary-identity-differs-by-demographics
title Undergraduate researchers' disciplinary identity differs by demographic characteristics
description Undergraduate researchers' disciplinary identity differs by demographic characteristics
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2019
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — shannon-n-davis-2019

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.