Engineering team focused on generative collaborative actions, product design team on creating shared understanding, and service design team on alleviating lack of knowledge¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Each team showed a distinct epistemic agency focus: Engineering on GCA, Product Design on CSU, Service Design on ALoK. → Ohsaki 2026
Evidence¶
Ohsaki 2026¶
Ohsaki, A., Tan, Y., Eagan, B., Shaffer, D. W., & Swiecki, Z. (2026). Temporal Network Analysis of Collaborative Prototyping from a Knowledge Creation Perspective. Journal of Learning Analytics, 13(1), 190–207. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2026.8959
q3 · i? · associational · r1
ONA network comparisons across three disciplinary teams during prototyping sessions. "the Engineering Team tended to focus more on GCA, the Service Design Team tended to focus more on ALoK, and the Product Design Team tended to focus on CSU." GCA is described as the final stage of epistemic actions for KC.
"Figure 4 and Table 5 show that the Engineering Team tended to focus more on GCA, the Service Design Team tended to focus more on ALoK, and the Product Design Team tended to focus on CSU."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Engineering, product design, and service design teams differ significantly in shared epistemic agency during collaborative prototyping — related
- Each team showed statistically significant changes in shared epistemic agency across prototyping phases — related
- Differences in shared epistemic agency between design teams change across prototyping phases — related
- Engineering team converged earlier than other teams, concluding prototyping two minutes before the time limit — related
- Across all three groups, discussion was dominated by epistemic actions—especially generative collaborative actions—with sharing knowledge more common in the synthesis phase and generative collaboration more prevalent in the application phase — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
disciplinary-kc-focus-differences-prototyping |
title |
Engineering team focused on generative collaborative actions, product design team on creating shared understanding, and service design team on alleviating lack of knowledge |
description |
Engineering team focused on generative collaborative actions, product design team on creating shared understanding, and service design team on alleviating lack of knowledge |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — ohsaki-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.