Engineering, product design, and service design teams differ significantly in shared epistemic agency during collaborative prototyping¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q3·i2medium
Currency · newest study 2026 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i2 Engineering team members scored significantly lower on both ONA dimensions than product design team members (d=0.496 X-axis, d=1.49 Y-axis), reflecting different KC approaches. → Ohsaki 2026
q3 i3 Product design team scored significantly higher on Y-axis than service design team (d=-2.12), reflecting greater focus on creating shared understanding. → Ohsaki 2026
q3 i1 Engineering team scored significantly higher on X-axis than service design team (d=0.79), reflecting engineers' focus on restructuring ideas versus service designers' information acquisition. → Ohsaki 2026
Evidence¶
Ohsaki 2026¶
Ohsaki, A., Tan, Y., Eagan, B., Shaffer, D. W., & Swiecki, Z. (2026). Temporal Network Analysis of Collaborative Prototyping from a Knowledge Creation Perspective. Journal of Learning Analytics, 13(1), 190–207. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2026.8959
q3 · i2 · associational · r1
Regression analysis of ONA scores from three teams (N=27 speaker-phase units) during 30-minute wallet prototyping sessions. Engineering vs Product Design: "t(24) =2.52 , p<0.05 , d=0.496" on X-axis and "d=1.49" on Y-axis. Engineering vs Service Design: d=0.79 on X-axis. Product Design vs Service Design: d=-2.12 on Y-axis.
"Members of the Engineering Team were significantly lower on both dimensions than members of the Product Design Team: t(24) =2.52 , p<0.05 , d=0.496 along the X-axis and t(24) =5.46 , p<0.05 , d=1.49 along the Y -axis."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Each team showed statistically significant changes in shared epistemic agency across prototyping phases — related
- Engineering team focused on generative collaborative actions, product design team on creating shared understanding, and service design team on alleviating lack of knowledge — related
- Differences in shared epistemic agency between design teams change across prototyping phases — related
- Engineering team converged earlier than other teams, concluding prototyping two minutes before the time limit — related
- All teams showed divergent-then-convergent idea improvement patterns across prototyping sessions — related
- The prototyping exercise promoted exchange of ideas for HLC development and enhanced a shared image of the HLC among team members — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
design-disciplines-differ-shared-epistemic-agency-prototyping |
title |
Engineering, product design, and service design teams differ significantly in shared epistemic agency during collaborative prototyping |
description |
Engineering, product design, and service design teams differ significantly in shared epistemic agency during collaborative prototyping |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — ohsaki-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.