Each team showed statistically significant changes in shared epistemic agency across prototyping phases¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Engineering team transitioned from ALoK focus to GCA then GCA+CSU, with significant differences between phases on both dimensions. → Ohsaki 2026 q3 i? Product design team moved from ALoK to CSU with no significant difference between Phases 2 and 3. → Ohsaki 2026 q3 i? Service design team maintained ALoK through Phases 1-2 then shifted to GCA in Phase 3. → Ohsaki 2026

Evidence¶

Ohsaki 2026¶

Ohsaki, A., Tan, Y., Eagan, B., Shaffer, D. W., & Swiecki, Z. (2026). Temporal Network Analysis of Collaborative Prototyping from a Knowledge Creation Perspective. Journal of Learning Analytics, 13(1), 190–207. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2026.8959

q3 · i? · associational · r1

Statistical tests contrasting phases within each team (Table 6). "The Engineering Team began by focusing on ALoK, then transitioned to GCA, and ended by focusing more on GCA and CSU." Product Design moved from ALoK to CSU. Service Design maintained ALoK then shifted to GCA.

"The Engineering Team began by focusing on ALoK, then transitioned to GCA, and ended by focusing more on GCA and CSU. Differences were statistically significant between Phases 1 and 2 on both dimensions, Phases 1 and 3 along the X-axis, and Phases 2 and 3 along the Y -axis."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Engineering, product design, and service design teams differ significantly in shared epistemic agency during collaborative prototyping — related
• Engineering team focused on generative collaborative actions, product design team on creating shared understanding, and service design team on alleviating lack of knowledge — related
• All teams showed divergent-then-convergent idea improvement patterns across prototyping sessions — related
• Differences in shared epistemic agency between design teams change across prototyping phases — related
• Engineering team converged earlier than other teams, concluding prototyping two minutes before the time limit — related
• Across all three groups, discussion was dominated by epistemic actions—especially generative collaborative actions—with sharing knowledge more common in the synthesis phase and generative collaboration more prevalent in the application phase — related