Disciplinary background is strongly associated with ChatGPT acceptance profile membership: STEM teachers concentrate in Technology Pioneers, non-STEM teachers in Environmental Observers and Resistant Skeptics¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q2·i2medium
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2031: baselines and conditions change
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i2 Profile membership differs by disciplinary background (χ²(3) = 36.20, p < .001, Cramer's V = 0.532), with STEM teachers concentrated in Technology Pioneers and non-STEM teachers overrepresented in Environmental Observers and Resistant Skeptics. → Pei-Hua Chen 2026
Evidence¶
Pei-Hua Chen 2026¶
Pei-Hua Chen, Hsin-Yu Lee, Yueh-Min Huang and Ting-Ting Wu. (2026). Unpacking the heterogeneity of pre-service teachers' ChatGPT acceptance: a latent profile analysis across STEM and non-STEM disciplines. International Journal of STEM Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-026-00634-x
q2 · i2 · associational · r1
Chi-square test of a contingency table crossing STEM/non-STEM background with the four LPA profiles among 128 pre-service teachers (68 STEM, 60 non-STEM). The article reports "Cramer's V = 0.532, corresponds to a medium-to-large association"; Fisher's exact test was also significant.
"The chi-square test of independence showed a highly significant association between disciplinary background and latent profile membership, χ²(3) = 36.20, p < .001. Fisher's exact test also indicated a robust association, p < .001. The effect size, Cramer's V = 0.532, corresponds to a medium-to-large association."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Latent profile analysis of pre-service teachers' ChatGPT acceptance yields four highly distinguishable profiles, with Pragmatic Evaluators the largest (47.66%) — related
- Cluster membership is significantly associated with grade level but not gender — related
- Cluster membership is significantly associated with gender, with a small-to-moderate effect (χ²(5) = 345.52, Cramér's V = 0.157) — related
- Inquiry-based exploration simulations were significantly more likely in exact and life sciences than humanities and social sciences — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
discipline-associates-with-acceptance-profile |
title |
Disciplinary background is strongly associated with ChatGPT acceptance profile membership: STEM teachers concentrate in Technology Pioneers, non-STEM teachers in Environmental Observers and Resistant Skeptics |
description |
Disciplinary background is strongly associated with ChatGPT acceptance profile membership: STEM teachers concentrate in Technology Pioneers, non-STEM teachers in Environmental Observers and Resistant Skeptics |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
recheck_by |
2031 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — pei-hua-chen-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.