Detailed disclosure does not make students more conservative about who should have access to their educational data¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Opinions on who should have access to educational data did not differ significantly between the disclosure conditions (χ 2(2) = 5.578, p = 0.061). → Stoo Sepp 2025
Evidence¶
Stoo Sepp 2025¶
Stoo Sepp. (2025). Towards More Transparency in Learning Analytics: Sharing Information with University Students Increases their Awareness of Data Collection Practices. Journal of Learning Analytics, 12(3), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2025.8713
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Aggregated data-access opinion means were 2.69 (control), 2.50 (text), and 2.48 (label) on a 1–4 scale; the Kruskal-Wallis test found "non-significant difference s between groups". H4 was not supported; the p-value was near the .05 threshold.
"With assumptions for a traditional ANOVA not met, a resulting Krusal-Wallis test suggested non-significant difference s between groups in terms of who should have access to the participants’ educational data (χ 2(2) = 5.578, p = 0.061)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Detailed data disclosure statements, in either text or nutrition-label format, increase university students' confidence that specific data points are collected compared to a generic disclosure — related
- Data disclosure of any format does not change students' acceptance of data collection by their university — related
- Students believe private companies neither have nor should have access to their educational data — related
- A majority of students think they should be informed of data collection details at multiple contact points throughout their studies — related
- In a 48-platform policy audit, data-collection disclosure was strongest while AI and accountability disclosures were weak — related
- The format of detailed disclosure (detailed text versus icon-based nutrition label) makes no difference to students' confidence about data collection — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
disclosure-no-effect-access-opinions |
title |
Detailed disclosure does not make students more conservative about who should have access to their educational data |
description |
Detailed disclosure does not make students more conservative about who should have access to their educational data |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — stoo-sepp-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.