Claims

During classroom observation, think-talk-write students appeared more enthusiastic and confident in mathematics than expository-taught students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q1
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? Authors' observations during three treatment sessions showed experimental-group students enthusiastic, actively questioning and competitive, while many control-group students avoided discussion and were embarrassed to answer. → Supandi 2018

Evidence

Supandi 2018

Supandi, S., Waluya, B., Rochmad, R., Suyitno, H., & Dewi, K. (2018). Think-Talk-Write Model for Improving Students' Abilities in Mathematical Representation. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 77-90. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1136a

q1 · i? · causal · r2

Authors' qualitative class observations during the treatment (students' activities of both groups were observed three times); this is the authors' interpretation, not a tested result. They conclude experimental students "had greater self-confidence" than control students.

"Based on the authors’ class observations during the learning process with the think -talk-write strategy, many students were enthusiastic about learning mathematics, and actively presented questions and competitively addressed the problems and answers."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.