Measurement noninvariance across over- versus underchallenged situations showed small dMACS effect sizes for the two non-reference boredom items¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q2 · i0 negligible
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i0 dMACS effect sizes for measurement noninvariance across situations were small for items 2 and 3 (0.032-0.110), with the easy part underchallenge condition as reference group. → Test Boredom While Working on Difficult Versus Easy Tasks: Online Supplementary Materials 2022

Evidence¶

Test Boredom While Working on Difficult Versus Easy Tasks: Online Supplementary Materials 2022¶

Test Boredom While Working on Difficult Versus Easy Tasks: Online Supplementary Materials. (2022). https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Test+Boredom+While+Working+on+Difficult+Versus+Easy+Tasks%22

q2 · i0 · causal · r?

Table S2a reports dMACS effect sizes for measurement noninvariance across situations, with the "Reference group = Easy Part - Underchallenge"; item 1 shows dMACS of 0.110 and 0.086, and the table also lists 0.032 and 0.037 for the reference items' cross-entries. These are small values.

"Study 1 - Effect Size for Measurement Noninvariance, dMACS Across Situations Item Reference Item Item 2 Item 3 1. I was bored. 0.110 0.086"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• A single boredom item correlated strongly with the full TBS-S scale in both the easy and difficult test parts — related
• Residual covariances were specified between specific item pairs in the Study 1 measurement-invariance test of the TBS-S across difficult and easy test parts — related