Residual covariances were specified between specific item pairs in the Study 1 measurement-invariance test of the TBS-S across difficult and easy test parts¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The Study 1 invariance model included residual covariances between items 2 and 6, 3 and 6, 2 and 4, 1 and 10, and 6 and 9. → Test Boredom While Working on Difficult Versus Easy Tasks: Online Supplementary Materials 2022

Evidence¶

Test Boredom While Working on Difficult Versus Easy Tasks: Online Supplementary Materials 2022¶

Test Boredom While Working on Difficult Versus Easy Tasks: Online Supplementary Materials. (2022). https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Test+Boredom+While+Working+on+Difficult+Versus+Easy+Tasks%22

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Supplemental Material S1 for Study 1 describes the specification of the measurement-invariance test of the TBS-S across the difficult and easy test parts, stating that "Residual covariances were specified between items 2 and 6, 3 and 6, 2 and 4, 1 and 10, and 6 and 9."

"Residual covariances were specified between items 2 and 6, 3 and 6, 2 and 4, 1 and 10, and 6 and 9."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• A single boredom item correlated strongly with the full TBS-S scale in both the easy and difficult test parts — related
• Measurement noninvariance across over- versus underchallenged situations showed small dMACS effect sizes for the two non-reference boredom items — related
• Abundance hypothesis: state test boredom relates negatively to performance on the difficult test part but not the easy part — related
• Test boredom relates positively to over- and underchallenge and negatively to intrinsic and extrinsic value — related
• Test boredom correlates negatively with math grades but not with the math test score in Study 1 — related