A single boredom item correlated strongly with the full TBS-S scale in both the easy and difficult test parts¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr?·q2·i3large
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i3 The part-whole-corrected item-total correlation of the single boredom item was r = .78 in the easy condition and r = .76 in the difficult condition. → Test Boredom While Working on Difficult Versus Easy Tasks: Online Supplementary Materials 2022
Evidence¶
Test Boredom While Working on Difficult Versus Easy Tasks: Online Supplementary Materials 2022¶
Test Boredom While Working on Difficult Versus Easy Tasks: Online Supplementary Materials. (2022). https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Test+Boredom+While+Working+on+Difficult+Versus+Easy+Tasks%22
q2 · i3 · associational · r?
Table S2b (Study 1) reports zero-order correlations between a single boredom item and all other scale items, with N = 204-208 (pairwise deletion); all coefficients were statistically significant at p < .05. The printed effect sizes for the part-whole-corrected item-total correlation were r = .78 in the easy condition and r = .76 in the difficult condition, i.e. "rj(t-j) =.78 in the easy condition and rj(t-j) =.76 in the difficult condition."
"The correlation of the single item with the total score excluding that item (i.e., the part-whole-corrected item–total correlation) is rj(t-j) =.78 in the easy condition and rj(t-j) =.76 in the difficult condition."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Measurement noninvariance across over- versus underchallenged situations showed small dMACS effect sizes for the two non-reference boredom items — related
- Residual covariances were specified between specific item pairs in the Study 1 measurement-invariance test of the TBS-S across difficult and easy test parts — related
- Abundance hypothesis: state test boredom relates negatively to performance on the difficult test part but not the easy part — related
- Test boredom relates positively to over- and underchallenge and negatively to intrinsic and extrinsic value — related
- Test boredom correlates negatively with math grades but not with the math test score in Study 1 — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
single-item-boredom-part-whole-correlations |
title |
A single boredom item correlated strongly with the full TBS-S scale in both the easy and difficult test parts |
description |
A single boredom item correlated strongly with the full TBS-S scale in both the easy and difficult test parts |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — test-boredom-while-working-on-difficult-versus-easy-tasks-online-supplementary-materials-2022 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.