Retention of IUPAC nomenclature learning was significantly better for the e-content group than the control group¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Retention test mean scores differed significantly between the control group (mean 30.44) and experimental group (mean 43.08), with calculated t-value 8.08 exceeding the tabulated value 2.021 at the 5% level. → G. Devendiran 2017

Evidence¶

G. Devendiran 2017¶

G. Devendiran, M. Vakkil. (2017). Effectiveness of e-content package on teaching IUPAC nomenclature of organic chemistry at undergraduate level. i-manager's Journal of Educational Technology, 14(3), 49-54. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1171298

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Retention test comparison in the same quasi-experiment: Table 4 reports retention means of 30.44 (control, n=35) and 43.08 (experimental, n=36), t = 8.08, marked significant at the 5% level. The findings section states retention through e-content is "significantly better than control group".

"From Table 4, it can be inferred that the calculated t– value 8.08 is higher than the tabulated value 2.021 at 5% level of significance."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Control-group students taught by conventional methods showed a significant pre-to-post gain in IUPAC nomenclature achievement — related
• Undergraduate students taught IUPAC nomenclature of organic chemistry through an e-content package scored significantly higher on the post-test than students taught by conventional methods — related
• Experimental-group students taught through the e-content package showed a significant pre-to-post gain in IUPAC nomenclature achievement — related