Claims

Control-group students taught by conventional methods showed a significant pre-to-post gain in IUPAC nomenclature achievement

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2022: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The control group improved from a pre-test mean of 16.08 to a post-test mean of 35.91, with calculated t-value 13.35 exceeding the tabulated value 2.021 at the 5% level. → G. Devendiran 2017

Evidence

G. Devendiran 2017

G. Devendiran, M. Vakkil. (2017). Effectiveness of e-content package on teaching IUPAC nomenclature of organic chemistry at undergraduate level. i-manager's Journal of Educational Technology, 14(3), 49-54. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1171298

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Within-group pre-post comparison for the control group (n=35) taught via existing conventional methods. Table 1 reports pre-test mean 16.08 (SD 5.79) and post-test mean 35.91 (SD 6.6), t = 13.35, significant at the 5% level.

"From Table 1, it can be inferred that the calculated 't'–value 13.35 is higher than the tabulated value 2.021 at 5% level of significance."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.