Claims

Undergraduate students taught IUPAC nomenclature of organic chemistry through an e-content package scored significantly higher on the post-test than students taught by conventional methods

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Post-test mean scores differed significantly between the control group (mean 35.97) and experimental group (mean 45.51), with calculated t-value 7.7 exceeding the tabulated value 2.021 at the 5% level. → G. Devendiran 2017

Evidence

G. Devendiran 2017

G. Devendiran, M. Vakkil. (2017). Effectiveness of e-content package on teaching IUPAC nomenclature of organic chemistry at undergraduate level. i-manager's Journal of Educational Technology, 14(3), 49-54. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1171298

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental Pre-test-Post-test Non Equivalent Groups Design with 71 undergraduates from two colleges (36 experimental, 35 control). Table 3 reports post-test means of 35.97 (control) and 45.51 (experimental), t = 7.7, "*Significant" at the 5% level.

"From Table 3, it can be inferred that the calculated t–value 7.7 is higher than the tabulated value 2.021 at 5% level of significance."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.