Claims

At post-test, the e-learning experimental group significantly outperformed the control group in attitude toward physics

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Post-test attitude-toward-physics scores differed significantly between the experimental and control groups in favor of the experimental group (t = 7.652, df = 62). → Hameed 2016

Evidence

Hameed 2016

Hameed, Saddam Mohammed; Mohammed, Essam Mahmoud. (2016). Enrich the Physics Curriculum Scheduled for Students of Intermediate School E-Learning and Its Effectiveness in Scientific Thinking and Their Attitude Towards the Development of Physics. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.7, No.17. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1105303

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Independent-samples t-test comparing post-test attitude scores of the two 32-student groups: experimental mean 77.000 (SD 9.108) versus control 59.812 (SD 8.858), "in favo r to the experimental group". No effect size is printed.

"On calculated t value (7 .652) is less than tabulated t value(1.999) at the level of (0.05) and degree of freedom (62) This means tha t there is a statistically significant differences between the mean scores of the trend measure of dimensional mem bers of two groups(experimental and control)in favo r to the experimental group"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.