Claims

Experimental-group students showed a significant increase in attitude towards mathematics from pre-test to post-test after multimedia instruction

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Within the experimental group, post-test attitude scores were significantly higher than pre-test scores (t = 7.762, p = .000). → Muthulakshmi and Veliappan 2015

Evidence

Muthulakshmi and Veliappan 2015

P. Muthulakshmi, A. Veliappan. (2015). Effectiveness of an Interactive Multimedia Learning Package in Developing Attitude Towards Mathematics. i-manager's Journal on School Educational Technology, Vol. 11, No. 3, December 2015 - February 2016. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1131820

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Within-group pre-post comparison for the 21 multimedia-taught experimental students. Table 6 reports pre-test mean 189.19 (SD 29.378) and post-test mean 210.62 (SD 26.886), t = 7.762, p = .000, S at 5% level.

"the calculated t-value (7.762) is greater than table value (0.5197) for df (20) at 5% level of significance. Hence, the null hypothesis is rejected. It shows that, there is no significant difference between the pretest and post-test scores of the experimental group"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.