EAI effectiveness was reported across all educational stages, with most studies in secondary education and university¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Across the 25 included studies, effectiveness of AI was reported at primary, secondary, vocational and university stages, with eleven secondary and ten university studies. → García-Martínez 2023

Evidence¶

García-Martínez 2023¶

García-Martínez, I., Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Fernández-Cerero, J., & León, S. P. (2023). Analysing the Impact of Artificial Intelligence and Computational Sciences on Student Performance: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 12(1), 171-197. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2023.1.1240

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Narrative characterization of the 25 included studies by educational stage in the discussion section. The review states "In all of them, the effectiveness of AI has been shown" and notes a tendency toward more studies at advanced educational stages.

"Thus, there are three studies in primary education, eleven contextualised studies in secondary education, one in vocational studies and ten studies in university. In all of them, the effectiveness of AI has been shown."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• EAI-based interventions show a significant positive pooled effect on student performance in the post-test meta-analysis (gp = 0.716) — related
• The pre-post meta-analysis of EAI effects did not reach statistical significance (g∆ = 0.552, p = .070) — related
• Secondary students most frequently use generative AI for step-by-step theoretical explanation and for checking their own solutions, more than for calculations — related
• Students' generative AI use in upper secondary schoolwork clusters into four practices — explanation, creation, inspiration, and improvement — comprising eleven sub-processes — related