EAI-based interventions show a significant positive pooled effect on student performance in the post-test meta-analysis (gp = 0.716)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr3·q3·i2medium
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i2 The pooled standardized mean difference of post-test scores across included studies was significant and moderate in size (gp = 0.716, 95% CI [0.426, 1.007]). → García-Martínez 2023
Evidence¶
García-Martínez 2023¶
García-Martínez, I., Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Fernández-Cerero, J., & León, S. P. (2023). Analysing the Impact of Artificial Intelligence and Computational Sciences on Student Performance: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 12(1), 171-197. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2023.1.1240
q3 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r3
Meta-analysis of 25 quasi-experimental studies with control groups, using a multi-level random-effects model in the metafor package for R. The review reports the printed effect size "gp = 0.716, 95% CI [0.426, 1.007]" with significant heterogeneity (Q (53) = 685.060, p < .001).
"Regarding the standardized mean change difference scores for post-test meta-analysis, the mean effect was significant:gp = 0.716, 95% CI [0.426, 1.007], z = 4.833,p < .001."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Type of AI moderated effect sizes: VR showed the largest pooled effect (gp = 1.28) and AR the smallest and non-significant in the post-test analysis — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- ChatGPT use shows a large positive pooled effect on students' learning performance (g = 0.867) across 44 experimental and quasi-experimental studies — related
- EAI effectiveness was reported across all educational stages, with most studies in secondary education and university — related
- The pre-post meta-analysis of EAI effects did not reach statistical significance (g∆ = 0.552, p = .070) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
eai-posttest-meta-analysis-positive-effect |
title |
EAI-based interventions show a significant positive pooled effect on student performance in the post-test meta-analysis (gp = 0.716) |
description |
EAI-based interventions show a significant positive pooled effect on student performance in the post-test meta-analysis (gp = 0.716) |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-15 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — garcía-martínez-2023 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.