Early (within ~100 ms) attentional modulation during encoding predicts subsequent working memory accuracy¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q2·i3large
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i3 Participants with greater attentional modulation of P1 amplitude around 100 ms post-stimulus showed greater subsequent memory of encoded stimuli (R=0.45, p<0.05). → Gazzaley A 2012
Evidence¶
Gazzaley A 2012¶
Gazzaley A, Nobre AC. (2012). Top-down modulation: Bridging selective attention and working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.11.014
q2 · i3 · review · r2
EEG study (Rutman et al.) using a delayed-response task with overlapping face and scene stimuli, reported via Figure 1 of the review. The correlation between early P1 modulation and subsequent memory was significant (R=0.45, p<0.05), supporting early filtering of distractors.
"Participants with greater attentional modulation of P1 amplitude (~100ms post-stimulus presentation) show greater subsequent memory of encoded stimuli (R=0.45, p<0.05)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Age-related deficits in top-down modulation underlie much of older adults' working memory impairment — related
- rTMS of right IFJ causally reduces top-down modulation during encoding and working memory accuracy — related
- Predictive cues aid transfer of perceptual representations into working memory via pre-encoding top-down modulation — related
- Perceptual attention is probably necessary but not sufficient for encoding stimuli into working memory — related
- Retro-cues during maintenance dynamically modulate working memory representations and confer large performance benefits — related
- Post-hoc finding: P1 latency was increased for attended versus unattended unilateral stimuli, selectively over the ipsilateral ROI — related
- Selective attention reduces encoding of unattended information and induces learned inattention that makes future learning more difficult — related
- Perceptual attention and working memory are distinct entities that causally affect each other — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
early-encoding-modulation-predicts-wm-accuracy |
title |
Early (within ~100 ms) attentional modulation during encoding predicts subsequent working memory accuracy |
description |
Early (within ~100 ms) attentional modulation during encoding predicts subsequent working memory accuracy |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2012 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — gazzaley-a-2012 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.