Claims

Early (within ~100 ms) attentional modulation during encoding predicts subsequent working memory accuracy

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i3 Participants with greater attentional modulation of P1 amplitude around 100 ms post-stimulus showed greater subsequent memory of encoded stimuli (R=0.45, p<0.05). → Gazzaley A 2012

Evidence

Gazzaley A 2012

Gazzaley A, Nobre AC. (2012). Top-down modulation: Bridging selective attention and working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.11.014

q2 · i3 · review · r2

EEG study (Rutman et al.) using a delayed-response task with overlapping face and scene stimuli, reported via Figure 1 of the review. The correlation between early P1 modulation and subsequent memory was significant (R=0.45, p<0.05), supporting early filtering of distractors.

"Participants with greater attentional modulation of P1 amplitude (~100ms post-stimulus presentation) show greater subsequent memory of encoded stimuli (R=0.45, p<0.05)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id early-encoding-modulation-predicts-wm-accuracy
title Early (within ~100 ms) attentional modulation during encoding predicts subsequent working memory accuracy
description Early (within ~100 ms) attentional modulation during encoding predicts subsequent working memory accuracy
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2012
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — gazzaley-a-2012

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.