Post-hoc finding: P1 latency was increased for attended versus unattended unilateral stimuli, selectively over the ipsilateral ROI¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? P1 latency was significantly increased for attended versus unattended conditions ipsilateral to the stimulus location, with no contralateral difference. → Banerjee Snigdha 2015
Evidence¶
Banerjee Snigdha 2015¶
Banerjee Snigdha, Frey Hans-Peter, Molholm Sophie, Foxe John J. (2015). Interests shape how adolescents pay attention: The interaction of motivation and top-down attentional processes in biasing sensory activations to anticipated events. The European Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.12810
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Post-hoc analysis (no a-priori prediction) of P1 latency (100–180 ms) for unilateral stimuli in 24 adolescents; ANOVA showed main effect of attention F(1,23) = 11.46, p =.003 and attention × ROI interaction F(1,23) = 17.21, p <.001. No bilateral-condition latency difference.
"paired samples t-tests were performed, which revealed significant increases in P1 latency for attended versus unattended conditions, but ipsilateral to the stimulus location (t(23) = 4.37, p <.001)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Motivation did not interact with visuospatial attention effects on post-stimulus visual evoked potentials to imperative stimuli — related
- Early (within ~100 ms) attentional modulation during encoding predicts subsequent working memory accuracy — related
- The effect of attention on linguistic-probe P1 latency interacts with age group — related
- rTMS of right IFJ causally reduces top-down modulation during encoding and working memory accuracy — related
- Perceptual attention is probably necessary but not sufficient for encoding stimuli into working memory — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
p1-latency-increased-attended-ipsilateral |
title |
Post-hoc finding: P1 latency was increased for attended versus unattended unilateral stimuli, selectively over the ipsilateral ROI |
description |
Post-hoc finding: P1 latency was increased for attended versus unattended unilateral stimuli, selectively over the ipsilateral ROI |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2015 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — banerjee-snigdha-2015 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.