Claims

Earlier participation relative to project deadlines (higher APTTD) predicts higher project grades

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i2 APTTD correlates r = .21 (p < .01) with grade and has the second largest regression coefficient B = .20 (p < .001); procrastinating groups tend to get lower grades. → Jaebong Yoo & Jihie Kim 2014

Evidence

Jaebong Yoo & Jihie Kim 2014

Jaebong Yoo & Jihie Kim. (2014). Can Online Discussion Participation Predict Group Project Performance? Investigating the Roles of Linguistic Features and Participation Patterns. Int J Artif Intell Educ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-013-0010-8

q2 · i2 · associational · r1

Regression analysis with grade as dependent variable over N = 173 groups; Table 7 reports APTTD correlating r = .21 with grade. A two-group illustration found Group A (final APTTD 0.86) received a higher grade than Group B (0.37), 0.93 vs. 0.72.

"APTTD has the second largest regression coefficient, B = .20 ( p < .001). This is consistent with recent findings from other researchers (Michinov et al. 2011) that high procrastinators tend to get lower grades."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-27
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.