Procrastination is the strongest negative predictor of daily study satisfaction, reducing satisfaction above and beyond time investment, planning, and effort¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr2·q2·i3large
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Procrastination negatively predicted daily study satisfaction (b = -0.53) above and beyond prior predictors, reducing residual variance by a further 24.3%. → Liborius 2019
q2 i3 Procrastination showed the largest bivariate relation with daily study satisfaction of the studied factors (r = -.62). → Liborius 2019 (2)
Evidence¶
Liborius 2019¶
Liborius, P., Bellhäuser, H., & Schmitz, B. (2019). What makes a good study day? An intraindividual study on university students' time investment by means of time-series analyses. Learning and Instruction, 60, 310-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.10.006
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Multilevel analysis testing Hypothesis 4 in the 105-student diary study. The article reports the printed coefficient, a better-fitting random-slope model (χ²(6) = 349.27, p < .05), and a 24.3% reduction in residual variance when procrastination was added.
"Procrastination negatively predicted students' daily study satisfaction above and beyond the previous predictors in the model (b procrastination = -0.53)."
Liborius 2019 (2)¶
Liborius, P., Bellhäuser, H., & Schmitz, B. (2019). What makes a good study day? An intraindividual study on university students' time investment by means of time-series analyses. Learning and Instruction, 60, 310-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.10.006
q2 · i3 · associational · r2
The article's discussion of the diary data reports procrastination as "the factor most related to students' daily study satisfaction" with the printed correlation r = -.62, echoing Schmitz and Wiese's earlier finding of -.68.
"Procrastination has been shown to be the factor most related to students' daily study satisfaction (r = -.62)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Effort positively predicts daily study satisfaction above and beyond time investment, breaks use, planning, and procrastination, with the full predictor set explaining 49.3% of intraindividual variance — related
- Planning the study day at its start positively predicts daily study satisfaction above and beyond time investment, with the relation differing between students — related
- Daily lecture time and independent study time each positively predict students' daily study satisfaction, with relations differing significantly between students — related
- Using breaks between lectures for independent study is an independent positive predictor of daily study satisfaction beyond overall time investment — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
procrastination-strongest-negative-predictor-satisfaction |
title |
Procrastination is the strongest negative predictor of daily study satisfaction, reducing satisfaction above and beyond time investment, planning, and effort |
description |
Procrastination is the strongest negative predictor of daily study satisfaction, reducing satisfaction above and beyond time investment, planning, and effort |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2019 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-23 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — liborius-2019, liborius-2019-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.