Claims

Procrastination is the strongest negative predictor of daily study satisfaction, reducing satisfaction above and beyond time investment, planning, and effort

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r2 · q2 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Procrastination negatively predicted daily study satisfaction (b = -0.53) above and beyond prior predictors, reducing residual variance by a further 24.3%. → Liborius 2019 q2 i3 Procrastination showed the largest bivariate relation with daily study satisfaction of the studied factors (r = -.62). → Liborius 2019 (2)

Evidence

Liborius 2019

Liborius, P., Bellhäuser, H., & Schmitz, B. (2019). What makes a good study day? An intraindividual study on university students' time investment by means of time-series analyses. Learning and Instruction, 60, 310-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.10.006

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Multilevel analysis testing Hypothesis 4 in the 105-student diary study. The article reports the printed coefficient, a better-fitting random-slope model (χ²(6) = 349.27, p < .05), and a 24.3% reduction in residual variance when procrastination was added.

"Procrastination negatively predicted students' daily study satisfaction above and beyond the previous predictors in the model (b procrastination = -0.53)."

Liborius 2019 (2)

Liborius, P., Bellhäuser, H., & Schmitz, B. (2019). What makes a good study day? An intraindividual study on university students' time investment by means of time-series analyses. Learning and Instruction, 60, 310-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.10.006

q2 · i3 · associational · r2

The article's discussion of the diary data reports procrastination as "the factor most related to students' daily study satisfaction" with the printed correlation r = -.62, echoing Schmitz and Wiese's earlier finding of -.68.

"Procrastination has been shown to be the factor most related to students' daily study satisfaction (r = -.62)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id procrastination-strongest-negative-predictor-satisfaction
title Procrastination is the strongest negative predictor of daily study satisfaction, reducing satisfaction above and beyond time investment, planning, and effort
description Procrastination is the strongest negative predictor of daily study satisfaction, reducing satisfaction above and beyond time investment, planning, and effort
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2019
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-23
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — liborius-2019, liborius-2019-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.