The Ecree study examined teachers' and students' use of the tool and its impact on student and teacher outcomes during the 2021-2022 school year¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr?·q1
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2026: local conditions change quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? A study of Ecree conducted during the 2021-2022 school year examined teachers' and students' use of the tool and the impact of Ecree on student and teacher outcomes. → Lindsay Fox 2023
Evidence¶
Lindsay Fox 2023¶
Lindsay Fox, Tareena Musaddiq, Sonia Pace. (2023). Study Methods for Briefs about Ecree Research Findings. Mathematica. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/study-methods-for-briefs-about-ecree-research-findings
q1 · i? · causal · r?
Descriptive statement of the study's scope from the methods summary itself, not a reported result. The Mathematica team, in collaboration with Ecree, designed a study of "teachers’ and students’ use of the tool" and of impacts on student and teacher outcomes during the 2021-2022 school year. No effect sizes are printed in this summary.
"designed and conducted the study to examine teachers’ and students’ use of the tool during the study and the impact of Ecree on student and teacher outcomes"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- A 2021–2022 study examined teachers' and students' use of MI Write and its impact on student and teacher outcomes — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Ecree likely improved the quality of students' writing, especially for students with less advanced writing skills at the start of the school year — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Teachers need tailored technical support and time to understand how to use Ecree and integrate it with their instruction — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Teachers found Ecree and MI Write useful for their writing instruction and for helping students improve their writing — related
- Teachers and students found Ecree easy to use and helpful for improving writing — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Teachers used Ecree less than intended, and some reported they did not have enough time to learn it and integrate it with instruction — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- About half of surveyed students agreed Ecree was easy to use and helped improve their writing — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- More than half of surveyed teachers agreed Ecree was useful for improving students' writing, but some students may be overwhelmed by the feedback — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
ecree-study-examined-use-and-impacts-2021-2022 |
title |
The Ecree study examined teachers' and students' use of the tool and its impact on student and teacher outcomes during the 2021-2022 school year |
description |
The Ecree study examined teachers' and students' use of the tool and its impact on student and teacher outcomes during the 2021-2022 school year |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
recheck_by |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — lindsay-fox-2023 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.