Edpuzzle qualifies for a Promising evidence rating based on one school-level randomized study¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Because random assignment occurred at the school level and analyses were conducted at the student level, the study qualifies Edpuzzle for a Promising evidence rating rather than a stronger one. → Edpuzzle evidence summary 2025

Evidence¶

Edpuzzle evidence summary 2025¶

Edpuzzle evidence summary. (2025). Edpuzzle. https://www.edpuzzle.com doi:10.2139/ssrn.5265891

q2 · i? · causal · r?

The summary's rating rationale rests on one randomized study (1 study, 1,843 students, average effect size +0.10) whose school-level randomization with student-level analyses limits the rating: "this study qualifies for a Promising evidence rating".

"Because random assignment occurred at the school level and analyses were conducted at the student level, this study qualifies for a Promising evidence rating."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Dosage relationship: more assigned Edpuzzle videos associated with larger gains — related
• Edpuzzle Original math videos raise grades 3–5 mathematics achievement on the CAASPP (effect size +0.09) — related
• The evaluation used a school-level cluster-randomized quasi-experiment (N = 50) that was powered only to detect large effects (d = 0.81) — related