Claims

Edpuzzle Original math videos raise Renaissance Star Math scores and fall-to-spring growth (effect size +0.11)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Students in Edpuzzle schools also scored higher on the Renaissance Star Math assessment (effect size = +0.11) and demonstrated greater growth from fall to spring. → Edpuzzle evidence summary 2025

Evidence

Edpuzzle evidence summary 2025

Edpuzzle evidence summary. (2025). Edpuzzle. https://www.edpuzzle.com doi:10.2139/ssrn.5265891

q3 · i? · causal · r?

In the same randomized grades 3–5 study (analytic sample 1,843 students across eight elementary schools), a second outcome measure showed treatment students "scored higher on the Renaissance Star Math assessment (effect size = +0.11)" with greater fall-to-spring growth.

"Students also scored higher on the Renaissance Star Math assessment (effect size = +0.11) and demonstrated greater growth from fall to spring."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id edpuzzle-star-math-effect-011
title Edpuzzle Original math videos raise Renaissance Star Math scores and fall-to-spring growth (effect size +0.11)
description Edpuzzle Original math videos raise Renaissance Star Math scores and fall-to-spring growth (effect size +0.11)
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — edpuzzle-evidence-summary-2025

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.