Effectiveness and statistical validity are the most commonly assessed validity criteria in TEL research¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Effectiveness (82 appearances) and statistical validity (78) were the most commonly assessed criteria, and around 75% of inclusions assessed them, overwhelmingly positively. → Haastrecht 2024

Evidence¶

Haastrecht 2024¶

Haastrecht, M. A. N. van, Haas, M., Brinkhuis, M. J. S., & Spruit, M. R. (2024). Understanding validity criteria in technology-enhanced learning: a systematic literature review. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105128

q2 · i? · review · r2

Frequency analysis of validity criteria across the review's 107 included TEL intervention studies, showing "Effectiveness (82 appearances) and statistical validity (78) were the most commonly assessed criteria".

"Effectiveness (82 appearances) and statistical validity (78) were the most commonly assessed criteria and Fig. 2 shows that they tended to be positively assessed based on results from quantitative methods."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Use of evaluation and validation frameworks in TEL research is rare and fragmented — related
• Validity criteria assessed with quantitative methods tend to be assessed more positively than those assessed with qualitative methods — related
• External validity and rigour tend to be negatively assessed in TEL research — related
• The prevalence and epistemological positioning of TEL validity criteria are stable over time — related