Use of evaluation and validation frameworks in TEL research is rare and fragmented¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Only 27 of 107 inclusions used an established evaluation or validation framework, and the most commonly used framework was employed only 4 times. → Haastrecht 2024

Evidence¶

Haastrecht 2024¶

Haastrecht, M. A. N. van, Haas, M., Brinkhuis, M. J. S., & Spruit, M. R. (2024). Understanding validity criteria in technology-enhanced learning: a systematic literature review. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105128

q2 · i? · review · r3

Count of framework usage across the review's included studies: "27 of our 107 inclusions used an established evaluation or validation framework, with the most commonly used framework employed only 4 times".

"Altogether, 27 of our 107 inclusions used an established evaluation or validation framework, with the most commonly used framework employed only 4 times."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Effectiveness and statistical validity are the most commonly assessed validity criteria in TEL research — related
• External validity and rigour tend to be negatively assessed in TEL research — related
• Validity criteria assessed with quantitative methods tend to be assessed more positively than those assessed with qualitative methods — related
• The prevalence and epistemological positioning of TEL validity criteria are stable over time — related