The prevalence and epistemological positioning of TEL validity criteria are stable over time¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Of the 24 criteria shown, 20 were already present in the 1998–2009 period, 17 in the same quadrant overall, and 15 with the same knowledge source categorisation. → Haastrecht 2024

Evidence¶

Haastrecht 2024¶

Haastrecht, M. A. N. van, Haas, M., Brinkhuis, M. J. S., & Spruit, M. R. (2024). Understanding validity criteria in technology-enhanced learning: a systematic literature review. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105128

q2 · i? · review · r3

Period-wise bubble plot comparison (Fig. 6) of criteria positioning across time windows, showing "17 are in the same quadrant overall as they were in 1998–2009". Elegance, fairness and usefulness changed quadrants.

"Of the 24 criteria shown in Figs. 2 and 20 are already included in the 1998–2009 plot. Of these 20, 17 are in the same quadrant overall as they were in 1998–2009, and 15 are both in the same quadrant and have the same knowledge source categorisation."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Validity criteria co-occurrence network can help select an epistemologically complete set of criteria for validation frameworks — related
• Effectiveness and statistical validity are the most commonly assessed validity criteria in TEL research — related
• Use of evaluation and validation frameworks in TEL research is rare and fragmented — related
• External validity and rigour tend to be negatively assessed in TEL research — related