Effort positively predicts daily study satisfaction above and beyond time investment, breaks use, planning, and procrastination, with the full predictor set explaining 49.3% of intraindividual variance¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · checked against its sources 2026-10-23 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Effort positively predicted daily study satisfaction (b = 0.35) above and beyond all prior predictors, and the full model explained 49.3% of intraindividual variance in daily study satisfaction. → Liborius 2019
Evidence¶
Liborius 2019¶
Liborius, P., Bellhäuser, H., & Schmitz, B. (2019). What makes a good study day? An intraindividual study on university students' time investment by means of time-series analyses. Learning and Instruction, 60, 310-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.10.006
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Multilevel analysis testing Hypothesis 5 in the 105-student diary study, with effort assessed in the evening questionnaire. The article reports the printed coefficient, a better-fitting random-slope model (χ²(7) = 205.53, p < .05), and a further 5.9% residual-variance reduction.
"Students' effort positively predicted their daily study satisfaction above and beyond the previous predictors in the model (b effort = 0.35)."
Liborius 2019 (2)¶
Liborius, P., Bellhäuser, H., & Schmitz, B. (2019). What makes a good study day? An intraindividual study on university students' time investment by means of time-series analyses. Learning and Instruction, 60, 310-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.10.006
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Summary of the final hierarchical multilevel model in the same diary study. The article reports the predictor set explained "a total of 49.3% of the intraindividual variance in students' daily study satisfaction" beyond the control variables.
"Overall, the predictors in the model explained a total of 49.3% of the intraindividual variance in students' daily study satisfaction above and beyond the preliminarily included control variables."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Procrastination is the strongest negative predictor of daily study satisfaction, reducing satisfaction above and beyond time investment, planning, and effort — related
- Using breaks between lectures for independent study is an independent positive predictor of daily study satisfaction beyond overall time investment — related
- Planning the study day at its start positively predicts daily study satisfaction above and beyond time investment, with the relation differing between students — related
- Daily lecture time and independent study time each positively predict students' daily study satisfaction, with relations differing significantly between students — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
effort-predicts-daily-study-satisfaction |
title |
Effort positively predicts daily study satisfaction above and beyond time investment, breaks use, planning, and procrastination, with the full predictor set explaining 49.3% of intraindividual variance |
description |
Effort positively predicts daily study satisfaction above and beyond time investment, breaks use, planning, and procrastination, with the full predictor set explaining 49.3% of intraindividual variance |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2019 |
source_checked |
2026-10-23 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-23 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — liborius-2019, liborius-2019-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.