Daily lecture time and independent study time each positively predict students' daily study satisfaction, with relations differing significantly between students¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In a two-level multilevel model, both lecture time (b = 0.11) and independent study time (b = 0.19) positively predicted daily study satisfaction, and random slopes indicated the relations differed between students. → Liborius 2019
Evidence¶
Liborius 2019¶
Liborius, P., Bellhäuser, H., & Schmitz, B. (2019). What makes a good study day? An intraindividual study on university students' time investment by means of time-series analyses. Learning and Instruction, 60, 310-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.10.006
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Multilevel analysis (days within persons) of the 105-student diary study testing Hypothesis 1, controlling for intended time and student-level variables. The article reports both time variables "positively predicted students' daily study satisfaction" with the printed coefficients, and a random-slope model fit better (χ²(5) = 499.00, p < .05).
"Both positively predicted students' daily study satisfaction (b lecture time = 0.11; b independent study time = 0.19)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Effort positively predicts daily study satisfaction above and beyond time investment, breaks use, planning, and procrastination, with the full predictor set explaining 49.3% of intraindividual variance — related
- Planning the study day at its start positively predicts daily study satisfaction above and beyond time investment, with the relation differing between students — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Using breaks between lectures for independent study is an independent positive predictor of daily study satisfaction beyond overall time investment — related
- Procrastination is the strongest negative predictor of daily study satisfaction, reducing satisfaction above and beyond time investment, planning, and effort — related
- Class-level student reports of memorizing formulas and listening to lectures positively predict mathematics achievement, while relating math to daily life negatively predicts it, across Swedish TIMSS waves 2003–2015 — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
time-investment-predicts-daily-study-satisfaction |
title |
Daily lecture time and independent study time each positively predict students' daily study satisfaction, with relations differing significantly between students |
description |
Daily lecture time and independent study time each positively predict students' daily study satisfaction, with relations differing significantly between students |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2019 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-23 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — liborius-2019 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.