Claims

Most surveyed EFL students want more control over their listening learning, including pace, material, repetition times and physical/emotional state

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2010 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2015: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In a questionnaire survey of two classes, about 71% of students thought they should be given more control of their own study, and 78.8% expressed this expectation on the open-ended question. → Wang 2010

Evidence

Wang 2010

Yushan Wang. (2010). To Give Control to Learners or Not? A Comparative Study of Two Ways of Teaching Listening. English Language Teaching, Vol. 3, No. 2. http://www.ccsenet.org/elt

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Questionnaire survey of two intact classes of second-year non-English majors at Huaiyin Normal University. The article reports "about 71% of students thought that they should be given more control of their own study"; 78.8% expressed this on the open-ended question.

"According to the results of one questionnaire survey conducted by the researcher in two classes at Huaiyin Normal University, about 71% of students thought that they should be given more control of their own study."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.