The experimental group's RCT mean-score increment exceeded the control group's increment (53.26 to 59.63 versus 54.14 to 55.34)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Descriptive means show the experimental group improved from 53.26 to 59.63 while the control group improved from 54.14 to 55.34 on the RCT. → Yussof et al. 2013

Evidence¶

Yussof et al. 2013¶

Yusfarina Mohd Yussof, Abdul Rasid Jamian, Zaitul Azma Zainon Hamzah, Samsilah Roslan. (2013). Students’ Reading Comprehension Performance with Emotional Literacy-Based Reading Comprehension Strategy. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies 1(1). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.1n.1p.82

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Descriptive comparison in Table 2 (N = 45 per group): experimental means 53.26 (SD 6.4201) pre and 59.63 (SD 9.1305) post; control means 54.14 (SD 8.5025) pre and 55.34 (SD 8.9470) post. The article states the "experimental group show cases more increment than that of the control group".

"From the mean score table (Table 2), it is found that the experimental group show cases more increment than that of the control group. The increment can be associated to the affects of the different interventions received by both groups."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The experimental group's posttest mean (75.71) exceeded the control group's (63.72) after treatment — related
• Students taught with intensive practical activities gained far more from pre-test to post-test (mean gain 26.0) than conventionally taught students (mean gain 2.8) — related
• Explicit morphology instruction raises EFL secondary students' reading comprehension more than regular EFL instruction alone — related
• ELBRCS intervention produced a significant group-by-interval interaction in Reading Comprehension Test scores favouring the experimental group over the control group — related